Law · Quebec, Canada
Quebec: Law 25 and the private-sector privacy act
Law 25, passed in 2021, rewrote Quebec's Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector. It is the only Canadian law that names biometrics directly: a database of biometric characteristics must be declared to the Commission d'acces a l'information at least 60 days before use, and biometric identification needs express consent. Penalties reach the greater of CAD 25 million or 4 percent of worldwide turnover.
Updated November 6, 2026 · 4 min read · reviewed November 6, 2026
-
2021-09-22
Law 25 assented
Bill 64 becomes Law 25, the first comprehensive modernisation of Quebec's private-sector privacy act since 1994.
-
2022-09-22
First provisions in force
Privacy officer designation, breach reporting, and the duty to declare a biometric database to the CAI 60 days before use.
-
2023-09-22
Main provisions and penalties
Consent rules, privacy impact assessments, transparency for automated decisions, administrative and penal penalties, private right of action.
-
2024-09-22
Data portability
Right to receive computerised personal information in a structured format.
-
2025-02-18
First biometric order
The CAI orders the retailer Metro to stop a facial recognition system and destroy the biometric data, the first use of its section 45 powers.
What does Law 25 cover?
Law 25 applies to any enterprise that collects, holds, uses or communicates personal information in Quebec, whether or not it is based there. It brought Quebec close to the GDPR model: a designated privacy officer, mandatory breach notification, privacy impact assessments before transfers outside Quebec, transparency when a decision is made solely by automated processing, and consent that must be clear, free, informed and given for specific purposes. Sensitive information, which includes biometric data, needs express consent.
The biometric rules sit in a companion statute, the Act to establish a legal framework for information technology. Section 44 says a person's identity may be verified or confirmed by biometric characteristics only with their express consent, and that no other information can be derived from the biometric characteristics. Section 45 requires anyone creating a database of biometric characteristics to disclose it to the CAI promptly and no later than 60 days before it comes into service, and lets the CAI order changes, suspension or destruction.
Who enforces it?
The Commission d'acces a l'information, Quebec's privacy regulator, which unlike the federal Commissioner can issue binding orders and, since September 2023, administrative monetary penalties. It was one of the three provincial regulators in the Clearview joint investigation and issued its own order requiring Clearview to stop collecting Quebec residents' images and to delete them within 90 days. In February 2025 it used section 45 for the first time against a retailer's in-store facial recognition.
What are the penalties?
| Route | Maximum | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Administrative monetary penalty (CAI) | Greater of CAD 10 million or 2 percent of worldwide turnover | Imposed by the CAI after notice; can be contested before the Commission |
| Penal proceedings | Greater of CAD 25 million or 4 percent of worldwide turnover | Doubled for a repeat offence; prosecuted by the Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions |
| Private right of action | Damages, with punitive damages of at least CAD 1,000 for intentional or grossly negligent breaches | Before the courts of Quebec |
What does it mean for face search?
Quebec is the Canadian jurisdiction with the clearest rule for a face index. A face search engine's index is a database of biometric characteristics: section 45 says it must be declared to the CAI 60 days before use, and section 44 says identification by biometrics needs express consent from the person identified, which an engine scraping public photos does not have. The Clearview order applied exactly this reasoning, and the Metro order shows the CAI will act against domestic deployments too. Engines such as PimEyes, FaceCheck.ID and FaceSearch that index Quebec residents are within scope regardless of where they are based.
| Situation | Position |
|---|---|
| You search your own face | Your express consent covers the processing of your upload; the search itself is lawful. |
| You search another person's face | Section 44 is addressed to whoever verifies identity by biometrics; the engine, not the user, carries the obligation. Misusing results engages the Civil Code's privacy protections and criminal law. |
| An engine indexes Quebec residents' faces | A biometric database that must be declared to the CAI 60 days in advance, built on identification without express consent: the Clearview order required deletion. |
What is pending?
The CAI published guidance on biometrics in 2024 and 2025 and has signalled more section 45 actions. Clearview's challenges to the Canadian orders continue in Alberta; the British Columbia order was upheld on appeal in February 2026. Whether Quebec courts will treat an offshore consumer engine's index as a database "created" in Quebec has not been tested.
Questions
Does Quebec regulate facial recognition specifically?
Yes. Sections 44 and 45 of the Act to establish a legal framework for information technology require express consent for biometric identification and a declaration to the CAI at least 60 days before a biometric database is used.
How big are the penalties?
Administrative penalties up to the greater of CAD 10 million or 2 percent of worldwide turnover; penal fines up to CAD 25 million or 4 percent, doubled for repeat offences; plus a private right of action.
Did Quebec act against Clearview?
Yes. After the 2021 joint findings, the CAI ordered Clearview to stop collecting Quebec residents' images and to destroy the data it held. See the Clearview case entries.
Does Law 25 apply to companies outside Quebec?
Yes, when they collect or hold personal information of people in Quebec in the course of an enterprise. Clearview, a US company, was ordered to comply.
Sources
- 1.Act respecting the protection of personal information in the private sector, CQLR c. P-39.1 (LegisQuebec) (checked November 6, 2026)
- 2.Act to establish a legal framework for information technology, CQLR c. C-1.1, sections 44 and 45 (checked November 6, 2026)
- 3.National Law Review, Quebec's Law 25: many provisions take effect today (22 September 2023) (checked November 6, 2026)
- 4.Mondaq, Privacy 101: Quebec's new Act 25, biometric data compliance (checked November 6, 2026)
Entry reviewed November 6, 2026. Found an error? Tell us.
Related entries
- Law Canada: PIPEDA, the federal private-sector privacy law Canada's PIPEDA and face search: consent for facial images, the 2021 Clearview findings, the provincial orders upheld on appeal, and Bill C-36 tabled in June 2026.
- Case Privacy Commissioners v Clearview AI (Canada) Canada's joint Clearview AI findings of 2021, the provincial orders that followed, and the British Columbia court decisions that upheld them through 2025.
- Organisation Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada (OPC) Canada's federal privacy regulator: its role under PIPEDA, the 2021 Clearview AI findings with the provincial commissioners, and how to complain.
- Term Biometric data Biometric data defined: identifying data from a face, fingerprint, iris or voice, when a photo becomes biometric data, and the GDPR, BIPA and DPDP rules.
- Term Consent (data protection) Consent in data-protection law: what makes it valid, when it must be explicit, why a public photo is not consent, and why face search engines rarely have it.
- Engine Clearview AI Clearview AI: the law-enforcement face search built on scraped web images, its 100-billion-image claim, who may use it, and fines and orders from seven countries.
Cite this entry
FaceSearch Wiki editors. "Quebec: Law 25 and the private-sector privacy act". FaceSearch Wiki, updated November 6, 2026. https://facesearch.wiki/laws/quebec-law-25/